NIKE Women's Mc Trainer Training Shoe

Product Information

The Nike MC trainer is definitely grippy. This shoe gives you a great solid foundation to really get a good lift in. Whether it is squats, or deadlifts, or even box jumps, the MC Trainer will meet your needs without leaving you feeling like you need to add something else to your arsenal.

The second aspect to like about the Nike MC Trainer 2 is its performance for athletic-style training. If you’re someone who on a weekly basis likes to lift, do HIIT workouts, do plyometrics, do agility work, and even some sprints, the MC Trainer 2 can be a good option to explore. The Nike SuperRep Go 3 Next Nature Flyknit also suffers from this issue and it can be frustrating, to say the least. The Nike MC Trainer utilized two tongue loops that sat lower on the tongue, while the MC Trainer 2 only has one loop and Nike has brought it up. On top of this, since this shoe has a low-profile boot construction and it can be prone to heel slip issues, sizing up will probably not be an option for most lifters and athletes. For wide and even flat feet, the size inclusivity of this model just isn’t there. Performance Another thing to like about this model for lifting is that I feel as though it articulates a little better than the previous MC Trainer and other budget-friendly training shoes. When doing sled work and lunges, this shoe’s toe box offered a fair amount of flexibility. I noticed that the tongue on this model moved during a few of my training sessions that had more lateral movement programmed, and I noticed it was tough at times to get the tongue to lay flush when putting these shoes on.If you have additional questions on the sizing and fit of the Nike MC Trainer 2 or how they compare to other cross-training shoes, drop a comment below. Nike MC Trainer 2 Vs Nike MC Trainer

The final aspect that I like with the Nike MC Trainer 2 is that it feels more flexible than the original MC Trainer. One of my complaints with the first model was how stiff the midfoot and heel could feel at times. But if you have wide feet, this is probably not your best bet. It could even seem a little tight if you have a mid-range foot.are looking for something to regularly run in (the Nike Free Metcon 3 is a good cross-training shoe for running) To discuss the performance of the Nike MC Trainer 2, I’m going to break down how this shoe performs in different training contexts. I’ll talk about this shoe’s performance for lifting, versatile training, shorter runs, and daily wear. If you’re considering the Nike MC Trainer versus the Nike MC Trainer 2, it’s a good idea to understand some of their key differences. There are three major construction differences that are worth noting about these models. Second, the increased mobility in this shoe is awesome for explosive and multi-directional training. For HIIT workouts and athletic-style training, I thought the Nike MC Trainer 2 did a pretty good job.

I don’t like cranking my laces super tight in this context, so the heel slip issue can be a little frustrating, at times. If you want to use these for daily wear, I’d suggest keeping this in mind and making sure you don’t experience similar slip issues. Nike MC Trainer 2 Sizing Additionally, these will not be the best CrossFit shoes on the market. They’ll work for casual WODs here and there but will fall short as you get more niche and serious with your training. The lifting performance with these shoes will be best for casual and recreational sessions. Testing the Nike MC Trainer 2 for Versatile Training For short runs, the Nike MC Trainer 2 has a pretty average performance. This model will work best for sprints, short interval runs, and short mileages ranging from 1-2 miles pre and post-workout.

For the Nike MC Trainer 2, if you have narrow or neutral (normal) width feet, then you should be safe going true to size in this model. This model’s length runs true and it has a narrow and neutral width or a more athletic fit. This shoe’s midsole provides a nice level of stability and when working with trap bar deadlifts over 425 lbs, I didn’t notice any glaring compression issues with this shoe. I also liked the level of tread the outsole provided on different surfaces. Looking into new cross-training shoes? Try my Cross-Training Shoe Finder. The calculator matches you with trainers that fit and suit your individual needs best. Who Should Invest In the Nike MC Trainer 2? The third and final difference to note is each shoe’s flexibility. The MC Trainer 2 feels less “stiff” through the midfoot and toe box compared to the MC Trainer. In my opinion, this is a big pro for training with the MC Trainer 2. For versatile training, I enjoyed the performance of the Nike MC Trainer 2 and think it has an edge over the original model in this context, and that’s for two reasons.